Abstract
We examine price behavior in the emerging Internet industry by comparing investor valuation of Internet subsidiary carve-outs with that of the parent. We provide examples of parent firms whose Internet carve-out holdings exceed the market value of the entire parent by a large magnitude and over an extended period of time. We reject alternative tax, liquidity, and agency cost hypotheses previously proposed as explanations of a related phenomenon, the closed-end fund discount. We conclude that investors, or at least an important clientele of investors, value direct Internet asset holdings more richly than indirect holdings via the parent.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have