Abstract

We study the duopolistic interaction between congestible facilities that supply perfect substitutes and make sequential decisions on capacities and prices, and compare the results to monopoly and first-best outcomes. At the Nash equilibrium prices and capacities, there is more congestion in the duopoly than in the social optimum. Given our assumptions, monopoly pricing and capacity choices result in the same congestion level as the social optimum. The higher congestion level under duopoly is due to strategic price responses to capacity investments. Moreover, higher marginal costs of capacity may increase duopoly profits. Lastly, when capacity is relatively cheap or demand relatively inelastic, stable asymmetric Nash equilibria may result, where the high-capacity facility offers low time costs at a high price, and the smaller facility offers lower service levels at a lower price. In that case, there is endogenous product differentiation by ex ante identical firms.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.