Abstract

BackgroundSystemic risk has received much more awareness after the excessive risk taking by major financial instituations pushed the world's financial system into what many considered a state of near systemic failure in 2008. The IMF for example in its yearly 2009 Global Financial Stability Report acknowledged the lack of proper tools and research on the topic. Understanding how disruptions can propagate across financial markets is therefore of utmost importance.Methodology/Principal FindingsHere, we use empirical data to show that the world's markets have a non-linear threshold response to events, consistent with the hypothesis that traders exhibit change blindness. Change blindness is the tendency of humans to ignore small changes and to react disproportionately to large events. As we show, this may be responsible for generating cascading events—pricequakes—in the world's markets. We propose a network model of the world's stock exchanges that predicts how an individual stock exchange should be priced in terms of the performance of the global market of exchanges, but with change blindness included in the pricing. The model has a direct correspondence to models of earth tectonic plate movements developed in physics to describe the slip-stick movement of blocks linked via spring forces.Conclusions/SignificanceWe have shown how the price dynamics of the world's stock exchanges follows a dynamics of build-up and release of stress, similar to earthquakes. The nonlinear response allows us to classify price movements of a given stock index as either being generated internally, due to specific economic news for the country in question, or externally, by the ensemble of the world's stock exchanges reacting together like a complex system. The model may provide new insight into the origins and thereby also prevent systemic risks in the global financial network.

Highlights

  • Like earthquakes, financial crises appear to be ever recurrent phenomena with the unfolding of a given crisis strongly dependent on the history that led up to the crunch

  • Systemic risk can for example ocour when the financial distress of major banks spreads through ripple effects to other banks who have acted as counterparties in common transactions with the banks in trouble [1]

  • In [5,6] it was reported that the US S&P500 market has beome prone to systemic collapses since 2002 but using a different technique, the index cohesive force (ICF), which measures the balance between stock correlations and partical correlations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Financial crises appear to be ever recurrent phenomena with the unfolding of a given crisis strongly dependent on the history that led up to the crunch. We emphasize a description where the price movements of any given stock market can not be solely understood by looking at the level of the individual stock exchange and propose that a proper characterization needs to account for system-wide movements at the global level.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call