Abstract

International rice markets are seen as volatile due to the thin nature of the market which is believed to be exacerbated by a low level of substitution between major rice export markets. In other words, this perceived lack of price transmission amongst international rice markets is believed to further thin out an already thin world rice market. The paper tests for price transmission between five major rice exporting markets representing Asia and the Americas over the past decade. It uses a vector autoregressive framework and performs Granger and Toda-Yamamoto causality tests and generalized impulse response functions to interpret the model’s results. The findings suggest that price transmission exists across these major rice export markets with price relations being the most widespread between Asian markets. Furthermore, the direction of price transmission suggests that Asian prices act as price leaders for North and South American prices. While it is not clear whether there is a price leader amongst the Asian export markets, Vietnam has the most extensive price relations with other export markets which would suggest that the Vietnamese rice export price is a more suitable world reference price than the Thai export price. An implication of the presence of price relations between rice export markets is that the world rice market is not as fragmented as generally perceived in the literature. However, it can also explain why international rice prices are so sensitive to the volatile trading behavior of major markets.

Highlights

  • The world rice market is seen as a thin market which is used to explain its volatile nature (Siamwalla and Haykin, 1983; Gibson, 1994; Wailes, 2002; Nielsen, 2003; Wailes, 2005; Headey, 2011; and Rapsomanikis, 2011)

  • The paper set out to examine the extent of price relations between major rice exporting nations using causality tests and impulse response functions (IRF) to test for price transmission

  • It is generally perceived in the literature that international rice markets have a low level of substitution which fragments the market and thins out an already thin world rice market

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The world rice market is seen as a thin market which is used to explain its volatile nature (Siamwalla and Haykin, 1983; Gibson, 1994; Wailes, 2002; Nielsen, 2003; Wailes, 2005; Headey, 2011; and Rapsomanikis, 2011). The second argument given is that international rice markets have a low level of substitution (Petzel and Monke, 1980; Siamwalla and Haykin, 1983 Rastegari-Henneberry, 1985; Cramer et al 1993; Jayne, 1993; Chan, 1997, Wailes, 2005; Dawe, 2008) which fragments the world market into even smaller unrelated markets and makes it harder to discover price information (Jayne, 1993). Due to the latter argument, one would expect price relations between international rice markets to be weak with little price transmission taking place across different geographical rice markets. Major rice exporting nations are competing in some of the same markets, in Africa and parts of Latin Americaa

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call