Prey Size Selection by the Mosquitofish: Relation to Optimal Diet Theory

Abstract

We investigated size—selective predation upon Daphnia pulex and D. magna by the mosquitofish (Gambusia). The independent variables were the relative size of predator and prey, prey density, and predator satiation. Gambusia actively chose to attack small prey (which we showed to be more profitable). Gambusia's preference increased monotonically, or decreased, or peaked at an intermediate prey size, depending upon fish size, prey size, and fish satiation level. These results contrast with the hypothesis the "gape—limited predators" select the largest prey available, and "size—limited predators" select small or intermediate—sized prey. Optimal diet theory predicts that a predator should drop less profitable prey items from the diet at higher prey densities. In contrast, Gambusia maintained a mixed diet and its preferences did not change in response to changes in either the absolute or the relative abundance of prey. Moreover, the ingestion rate would have been higher if less profitable (larger) prey types had been ignored. Gambusia did sharply alter its size—selective feeding behavior in response to its own satiation level, and we expect that this factor is correlated with prey density in the field. Well—fed fish concentrated their attacks, to a greater degree than starved fish, on small, more profitable prey. They also ingested less biomass per unit time. This last result suggests that maximizing food intake per unit time may not be the goal of well—fed fish, and that different criteria may determine the profitability of prey at different prey densities.