Abstract

We hypothesize that megafauna extinctions throughout the Pleistocene, that led to a progressive decline in large prey availability, were a primary selecting agent in key evolutionary and cultural changes in human prehistory. The Pleistocene human past is characterized by a series of transformations that include the evolution of new physiological traits and the adoption, assimilation, and replacement of cultural and behavioral patterns. Some changes, such as brain expansion, use of fire, developments in stone-tool technologies, or the scale of resource intensification, were uncharacteristically progressive. We previously hypothesized that humans specialized in acquiring large prey because of their higher foraging efficiency, high biomass density, higher fat content, and the use of less complex tools for their acquisition. Here, we argue that the need to mitigate the additional energetic cost of acquiring progressively smaller prey may have been an ecological selecting agent in fundamental adaptive modes demonstrated in the Paleolithic archaeological record. We describe several potential associations between prey size decline and specific evolutionary and cultural changes that might have been driven by the need to adapt to increased energetic demands while hunting and processing smaller and smaller game.

Highlights

  • Quaternary 2021, 4, 7. https://The potential role of human overhunting in megafauna (>45 kg) extinctions during the Pleistocene is a subject of long debate

  • We describe several potential associations between prey size decline and specific evolutionary and cultural changes that might have been driven by the need to adapt to increased energetic demands while hunting and processing smaller and smaller game

  • In agreement with Geist [145] and Stewart [146], we hypothesize that the decline in prey size in Europe during the Late Quaternary megafauna extinction (LQE) was a significant driver of Neandertal extinction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The potential role of human overhunting in megafauna (>45 kg) extinctions during the Pleistocene is a subject of long debate. We hypothesize that large prey’s declining availability was a prominent agent of selection (sensu MacColl [1]) in human evolution and cultural change. Having established the prey size decline and its potential effect on humans, we speculate on evolutionary and cultural adaptations in human prehistory that could have been caused by prey decline as an agent of selection. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Full testing of such a wide-ranging hypothesis requires many years of work, gathering and analyzing quantitative data about prey size dynamics in specific periods and places and quantifications of tempospatially associated specific evolutionary and cultural changes. We present the hypothesis in broad brushstrokes with the intention of it generating interest and further exploration

Pleistocene Decline in Prey Size
The Trophic Position of Humans
Specialization in Large Prey
High Relative Biomass
Not Escaping–Easier Tracking and Less Complex Hunting Tools
Larger Prey Contains Higher Body Fat Levels
Larger Animals Provide a Higher Energetic Return
Evidence for Specialization in Large Prey
Anthropogenic Contribution to Prey Size Decline
The Decline in Prey Size as an Agent of Selection
The Extinction of the Neandertal
Increased Plant Food Consumption from the Upper Paleolithic Onward
Dog Domestication
Plant and Animal Domestication at Different Times and Places
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call