Abstract
We hypothesize that megafauna extinctions throughout the Pleistocene, that led to a progressive decline in large prey availability, were a primary selecting agent in key evolutionary and cultural changes in human prehistory. The Pleistocene human past is characterized by a series of transformations that include the evolution of new physiological traits and the adoption, assimilation, and replacement of cultural and behavioral patterns. Some changes, such as brain expansion, use of fire, developments in stone-tool technologies, or the scale of resource intensification, were uncharacteristically progressive. We previously hypothesized that humans specialized in acquiring large prey because of their higher foraging efficiency, high biomass density, higher fat content, and the use of less complex tools for their acquisition. Here, we argue that the need to mitigate the additional energetic cost of acquiring progressively smaller prey may have been an ecological selecting agent in fundamental adaptive modes demonstrated in the Paleolithic archaeological record. We describe several potential associations between prey size decline and specific evolutionary and cultural changes that might have been driven by the need to adapt to increased energetic demands while hunting and processing smaller and smaller game.
Highlights
Quaternary 2021, 4, 7. https://The potential role of human overhunting in megafauna (>45 kg) extinctions during the Pleistocene is a subject of long debate
We describe several potential associations between prey size decline and specific evolutionary and cultural changes that might have been driven by the need to adapt to increased energetic demands while hunting and processing smaller and smaller game
In agreement with Geist [145] and Stewart [146], we hypothesize that the decline in prey size in Europe during the Late Quaternary megafauna extinction (LQE) was a significant driver of Neandertal extinction
Summary
The potential role of human overhunting in megafauna (>45 kg) extinctions during the Pleistocene is a subject of long debate. We hypothesize that large prey’s declining availability was a prominent agent of selection (sensu MacColl [1]) in human evolution and cultural change. Having established the prey size decline and its potential effect on humans, we speculate on evolutionary and cultural adaptations in human prehistory that could have been caused by prey decline as an agent of selection. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Full testing of such a wide-ranging hypothesis requires many years of work, gathering and analyzing quantitative data about prey size dynamics in specific periods and places and quantifications of tempospatially associated specific evolutionary and cultural changes. We present the hypothesis in broad brushstrokes with the intention of it generating interest and further exploration
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.