Abstract

The lack of integrity and corruption affects human rights, has important implications on the market and represents an issue in Public Procurement. Non-transparent economic interests supported by lobbies may influence legislation, its implementation, the competition and finally the economic growth and competiveness of the market itself.One increasingly popular way for States to prevent bribery committed overseas is adopting measures with extraterritorial implications or to assert direct extraterritorial jurisdiction in specific instances. These measures may have local preferences implications.A community of values is growing in the wider context of transnational and international bodies such as OECD, UN, and single Member States, to promote a joint system against corruption, but still needs clear means of actions.How to ensure integrity, accountability and transparency of public authorities and economic operators across Countries?The paper investigates two different profiles linked to the same phenomena with a comparative approach. The legal boundaries of lobbying as joint to conflicts of interest and corruption, on one side; the effects of some extraterritorial legislation, such as the US and the UK anti-bribery models, on the other. It analyses the role of private and public preventive anti-corruption measures as a mean of action.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.