Abstract

During the operation of a mine, waste rock is often deposited in heaps and usually left under ambient conditions allowing sulfides to oxidize. To focus on waste rock management for preventing acid rock drainage (ARD) formation rather than ARD treatment could avoid its generation and reduce lime consumption, costs, and sludge treatment. Leachates from 10 L laboratory test cells containing sulfide-rich (> 60% pyrite) waste rock with and without the addition of lime kiln dust (LKD) (5 wt.%) were compared to each other to evaluate the LKD’s ability to maintain near neutral pH and reduce the sulfide oxidation. Leaching of solely waste rock generated an acidic leachate (pH < 1.3) with high concentrations of As (21 mg/L), Cu (20 mg/L), Fe (18 g/L), Mn (45 mg/L), Pb (856 μg/L), Sb (967 μg/L), S (17 g/L), and Zn (23 mg/L). Conversely, the addition of 5 wt.% LKD generated and maintained a near neutral pH along with decreasing of metal and metalloid concentrations by more than 99.9%. Decreased concentrations were most pronounced for As, Cu, Pb, and Zn while S was relatively high (100 mg/L) but decreasing throughout the time of leaching. The results from sequential extraction combined with element release, geochemical calculations, and Raman analysis suggest that S concentrations decreased due to decreasing sulfide oxidation rate, which led to gypsum dissolution. The result from this study shows that a limited amount of LKD, corresponding to 4% of the net neutralizing potential of the waste rock, can prevent the acceleration of sulfide oxidation and subsequent release of sulfate, metals, and metalloids but the quantity and long-term stability of secondary minerals formed needs to be evaluated and understood before this method can be applied at a larger scale.

Highlights

  • The ability to reduce sulfide oxidation in waste rock after mine closure is a widely researched area, as is, the treatment of acid rock drainage (ARD) formed during operation (Kefeni et al 2017; INAP 2014; Lottermoser 2010)

  • To meet one of these requirements, waste rock was selectively chosen based on sulfur content, previously described by Alakangas et al (2013) and Nyström et al (2019) and included screening of waste rock piles with a handheld X-ray fluorescence (XRF) of the brand Olympus Innov-x systems, USA, for selectively choosing waste rock with high sulfur content

  • During the operation of a mine, waste rock is commonly left under ambient conditions for tens of years before preventive

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ability to reduce sulfide oxidation in waste rock after mine closure is a widely researched area, as is, the treatment of acid rock drainage (ARD) formed during operation (Kefeni et al 2017; INAP 2014; Lottermoser 2010). Less research focuses on the prevention of sulfide oxidation in waste rock during operation. Passivation is considered a low-cost prevention technique, especially compared with traditional mine drainage treatments using alkaline additives (Sahoo et al 2013a). Most of the materials studied for passivation are either too expensive or potentially harmful to the environment (Sahoo et al 2013b) and almost exclusively focus on tailings rather than waste rock. There is a need to find cost-effective materials able to passivate sulfide surfaces in waste rock in a long-term perspective

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call