Abstract

This article examines the role of interpol in the cases M.G. v. Bulgaria (2014) and Khadzhiev v. Bulgaria (2014), decided by the European Court of Human Rights. In both cases the applicants have suffered a violation of human rights due to an improper use of the interpol’s information system. The cases show that interpol’s internal regulations do not include enough legal safeguards to prevent member countries from misusing the tools provided by the Organization. At present interpol’s internal regulations rely mainly on internal supervision and ex-post review processes. This article addresses the inherent weaknesses of those processes, and advocates for a diversification of the current safeguards by expanding the structure of the notices and the diffusions system. Furthermore, it discusses the possibility of a more consistent use of the remedies and sanctions already present in interpol’s internal regulations.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.