Abstract

BackgroundPeople intending to travel may seek information on malaria prevention from a range of sources. To ensure the best protection, this information needs to be reliable, up-to-date, consistent, and useful to their decision making. This study appraises current international and national guidelines written in English for malaria prevention in travellers, and whether any recommendations conflict.MethodsWe systematically identified national or international English-language guidelines on malaria prevention in travellers to July 2013 using standard and multiple searching methods. We critically appraised guidelines using the AGREE II tool, and report inconsistent recommendations within guidelines.ResultsWe identified five sets of English-language guidelines on preventing malaria for travellers. Assessment against AGREE II indicate that all of the guidelines fall short of internationally accepted standards in guideline development: none include a transparent description of methods; only one describes sources of funding or potential conflicts of interest; and only one includes formal presentation of the evidence alongside transparent assessment of the quality of that evidence. There were a number of important discrepancies between guidelines, and some omit information about effectiveness, safety and adverse effects of chemoprophylaxis options.ConclusionsThe methods used for developing guidelines for malaria prevention in travellers lags behind current internationally recognized standards. Healthcare professionals as well as travellers themselves could be better informed if guidelines were more systematic and transparent summaries of the current knowledge on drug interventions in relation to effects, safety, administration and contra-indications.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1129) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • People intending to travel may seek information on malaria prevention from a range of sources

  • In the UK, approximately 2,000 episodes of malaria are recorded each year in people returning from travel to endemic countries, and travellers still die from malaria [1]

  • Travellers can reduce their risk of malaria illness by taking antimalarial drugs throughout their time abroad as prophylaxis, and by various non-drug interventions which reduce mosquito bites

Read more

Summary

Introduction

People intending to travel may seek information on malaria prevention from a range of sources. This study appraises current international and national guidelines written in English for malaria prevention in travellers, and whether any recommendations conflict. In the UK, approximately 2,000 episodes of malaria are recorded each year in people returning from travel to endemic countries, and travellers still die from malaria [1]. Travellers can reduce their risk of malaria illness by taking antimalarial drugs throughout their time abroad as prophylaxis, and by various non-drug interventions which reduce mosquito bites. To ensure the best protection, this information needs to be reliable, up-todate and based on the best available research evidence. Many other guidelines are available developed by other national or international bodies

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call