Abstract

.In 2013, the outbreak of wild poliovirus (WPV) in the Horn of Africa (HOA) triggered an aggressive, coordinated national and regional response to interrupt continued transmission. Kenya, Somalia, Ethiopia, South Sudan, and other HOA countries share a range of complex factors that enabled the outbreak: porous and sparsely populated borders, insecurity due to armed conflicts, and weak health systems with persistently under-resourced health facilities resulting in low-quality care and low levels of immunization coverage in mobile populations. Consequently, the continued risk of WPV importation demanded cross-border and intersectoral collaboration. Assessing and addressing persistent communication gaps at the subnational levels were necessary to gain traction for improved immunization coverage and surveillance activities. This article describes a systematic approach to institutionalizing processes of dialogue and facilitation that can provide for a sustainable and effective joint cross-border health platform between Kenya and Somalia. It examines an operational model called the Cross-Border Health Initiative (CBHI) to support joint intercountry collaboration and coordination efforts. To evaluate progress of the CBHI, the authors used data from population coverage surveys for routine immunization and supplemental immunization activities (for polio), from acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance, and from plans developed by border districts and border health facilities. The project-trained community health volunteers have been a critical link between the hard-to-reach communities and the health facilities as well as an excellent resource to support understaffed health facilities. The authors conclude that the CBHI has been effective in bolstering immunization coverage, disease surveillance, and rapid outbreak response in border areas. The CBHI has the potential to address other public health threats that transcend borders.

Highlights

  • For more than three decades, humankind has pursued the possibility of a “polio-free world.”[1]

  • Somalia, Ethiopia, South Sudan, and other Horn of Africa (HOA) countries share a range of complex factors that enabled the outbreak: porous and sparsely populated borders, insecurity due to armed conflicts, and weak health systems with persistently under-resourced health facilities resulting in low-quality care and low levels of immunization coverage in mobile populations

  • To evaluate progress of the Cross-Border Health Initiative (CBHI), the authors used data from population coverage surveys for routine immunization and supplemental immunization activities, from acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance, and from plans developed by border districts and border health facilities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For more than three decades, humankind has pursued the possibility of a “polio-free world.”[1]. In 2010, the first WPV importation into the European region since the region was declared polio-free in 2002 resulted in 476 confirmed cases: 458 in Tajikistan, 14 in Russia, three in Turkmenistan, and one in Kazakhstan. In Africa and Asia, 11 new importations into six countries were observed in 2010; 30 WPV importations during 2008–2009 resulted in 215 WPV cases in 15 African countries during 2009–2013. Somalia experienced a polio-free period from 2007 to 2013.5 This period of calm was upset when an outbreak of WPV type 1 (WPV1) rattled the Horn of Africa (HOA).[6] In May 2013, the Somalia Ministry of Health (MOH) and the WHO reported a confirmed WPV1 case in a child from Mogadishu (Banadir region). All the Somalia polio cases belonged to cluster N5A,† which was known to have been circulating in northern Nigeria since 2011

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.