Abstract

False-positive results because of carryover contamination by previously amplified nucleic acids are currently the greatest impediment to routine implementation of nucleic acid amplification protocols. We evaluated three methods for inactivation of a 156-bp Borrelia burgdorferi polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product: (i) post-PCR cross-linking with isopsoralen (IP), (ii) pre-PCR treatment of a dU-containing PCR product with uracil N-glycosylase (UNG), and (iii) post-PCR alkaline hydrolysis (primer hydrolysis) of PCR products synthesized by using primers containing 3' ribose residues. The sensitivities of the PCR performed under the conditions of each protocol were comparable. Inactivation of amplified DNA was highly efficient for all three protocols; the IP and UNG protocols eliminated at least to 3 x 10(9) copies of the product. The primer hydrolysis protocol varied in efficiency depending on the number and position of the 3' ribose residues, but inactivation ranged from 10(4) to 10(9) copies. We conclude that with some modifications, all three systems are effective for eliminating amplified DNA products. Routine implementation of at least one method should help to avoid false-positive results because of carryover contamination.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.