Abstract

Cancer is characterized by uncontrolled cell growth, and the cause of different cancers is generally attributed to checkpoint dysregulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis. Recent studies have shown that non-optimal codons were preferentially adopted by genes to generate cell cycle-dependent oscillations in protein levels. This raises the intriguing question of how dynamic changes of codon usage modulate the cancer genome to cope with a non-controlled proliferative cell cycle. In this study, we comprehensively analyzed the somatic mutations of codons in human cancers, and found that non-optimal codons tended to be accumulated through both synonymous and non-synonymous mutations compared with other types of genomic substitution. We further demonstrated that non-optimal codons were prevalently accumulated across different types of cancers, amino acids, and chromosomes, and genes with accumulation of non-optimal codons tended to be involved in protein interaction/signaling networks and encoded important enzymes in metabolic networks that played roles in cancer-related pathways. This study provides insights into the dynamics of codons in the cancer genome and demonstrates that accumulation of non-optimal codons may be an adaptive strategy for cancerous cells to win the competition with normal cells. This deeper interpretation of the patterns and the functional characterization of somatic mutations of codons will help to broaden the current understanding of the molecular basis of cancers.

Highlights

  • Genetic redundancy refers to multiple copies of the same or similar genetic sequences [1]

  • We obtained the cancer somatic mutations from the International Cancer Genome Consortium [21], and mapped them onto the coordinates of the ensembl genes to investigate their impact on codon transformations (CSM, see Methods)

  • About 3.88% of the cancer non-synonymous mutations of non-optimal codons result in optimal codons, and the percentage increased to 4.50% and 5.75% in the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)-Poly and Ortholog-Poly datasets (p = 7.19e-3 and 2.16e-31, Chi-square, two-tail test)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Genetic redundancy refers to multiple copies of the same or similar genetic sequences [1]. The benefit comes from having backups of genes with similar functions by gene duplication or by up-regulating gene products and making more products to drive efficiency. The ‘redundancy’ in the genetic code refers to requiring fewer than 61 tRNAs when 61 codons are translated (isoaccepting codons) [2], especially in cases where the base at the 5’ end of the anticodon is inosine. According to the ‘wobble’ base-pairing rules, the four main wobble base pairs include. Codons can be classified as optimal or non-optimal, where non-optimal codons are characterized by wobble-pairing a low concentration of isoaccepting tRNAs with low binding affinities [4]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call