Abstract

Beginning in 2007, all newly diagnosed cancer patients at the Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center (KF-SYSCC) were screened for psychosocial distress. Our social workers, as part of the psychosocial care team (PCT), have engaged in proactive outreach with patients identified as distressed. The goal of the present study was to assess the prevalence of psychosocial distress and the extent of contact between the PCT and distressed patients. Newly diagnosed patients who were treated at KF-SYSCC between 2007 and 2010 for cancer were eligible if there were at least 100 patients with the same type of cancer. Before treatment began, they were screened with the Pain Scale and the Distress Thermometer (DT) and had the option to specify a desire for help. The rates of distress were analyzed by cancer type and by probable related factors. Information regarding contact with the PCT was retrieved from computerized databases. Overall, some 5,335 cancer patients representing 12 major cancer types were included in our study. Of these, 1,771 (33.20%) were significantly distressed. By multivariate logistic regression, younger age, female gender, higher pain score, and disease stage, but not cancer type, were found to be associated with higher rates of distress. Among these distressed patients, 628 (36%) had some contact with the PCT. This Taiwanese study with a large sample size revealed a prevalence rate of psychosocial distress similar to rates found in Western countries. Contact with the PCT was established in only 36% of significantly distressed patients, despite a proactive outreach program. It is very important to have screening results made available in a timely fashion to the psycho-oncology team so that appropriate care can be offered promptly.

Highlights

  • It has been well documented that the rates of psychosocial distress in cancer patients at different stages of their treatment are high and that psychosocial interventions can be effective

  • Significance of results: This Taiwanese study with a large sample size revealed a prevalence rate of psychosocial distress similar to rates found in Western countries

  • Contact with the psychosocial care team (PCT) was established in only 36% of significantly distressed patients, despite a proactive outreach program

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has been well documented that the rates of psychosocial distress in cancer patients at different stages of their treatment are high and that psychosocial interventions can be effective The first was the landmark study by Zabora and colleagues (2001), who utilized the 53-item Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) on newly diagnosed cancer patients at an oncology center in the United States with a sample size of 4,496 over a period of 6 years. Three other studies utilizing the BSI–18 or the Distress Thermometer (DT) on more than a thousand patients reported a distress prevalence rate of 32–44% (Carlson et al, 2004; Kendall et al, 2011; Grassi et al, 2013)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.