Abstract
Pediatric extubation failure is associated with morbidity and mortality. The most common cause is upper-airway obstruction. Subglottic edema is common, but upper-airway obstruction can occur from the oral cavity to the trachea. Dichotomous categorization of extubation failure as airway versus non-airway may help identify risk factors as well as strategies that translate to lower extubation failure rates. This was as single-center, retrospective cohort study of invasive mechanical ventilation encounters within a quality improvement database between October 1, 2017-November 30, 2020. Utilizing a 3-physician adjudication process, all extubation failures were categorized as airway versus non-airway. Primary outcome was failure subtype prevalence. Secondary outcome was failure subtype risk factors. Clinical outcomes were explored. The all-cause extubation failure rate was 10% in a cohort of 844 encounters. Airway and non-airway extubation failure represented 60.7% and 39.3%, respectively. Most airway failures were due to upper-airway obstruction (84.3%)-35.3% were supraglottic, 25.5% subglottic, and 23.5% mixed. Other causes of airway failure were airway patency/secretions (11.8%) and aspiration (3.9%). Non-airway failures were attributed to respiratory failure (75.8%), encephalopathy (15.2%), and other (9%). All-cause extubation failure was associated with dysgenetic/syndromic comorbidity (P = .005), ≥ 3 concurrent comorbid conditions (P = .007), indication for invasive ventilation (P < .001), and longer invasive mechanical ventilation duration (P < .001). Airway extubation failure was significantly associated with the presence of a respiratory comorbidity (P = .01) and Glasgow coma scale < 10 (P = .02). No significant non-airway failure risk factors were identified. Longer pediatric ICU (PICU) stay (P < .001) and PICU mortality (P < .001) were associated with all-cause extubation failure. No significant outcome associations with extubation failure subtype were identified. Airway extubation failure prevalence was 1.5 times higher than non-airway failure. Potential risk factors for airway failure were identified. These findings are hypothesis generating for future study focused on key evidence gaps and pragmatic bedside application.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.