Abstract
The convenient and popular "years below grade" formula conventionally used to define reading disability operates in an irregular manner and gives a picture of "disability" which is difficult to distinquish from normal variation in human ability. It also causes the prevalence of reading disorders to appear larger as years of schooling increase. Other measures give a more conservative estimate of the prevalence of disability and they may be more significant.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
