Abstract

BackgroundMalaria rapid diagnostic tests have become a primary and critical tool for malaria diagnosis in malaria-endemic countries where Plasmodium falciparum Histidine Rich Protein 2-based rapid diagnostic tests (PfHRP2-based RDTs) are widely used. However, in the last decade, the accuracy of PfHRP2-based RDTs has been challenged by the emergence of P. falciparum strains harbouring deletions of the P. falciparum histidine rich protein 2 (pfhrp2) gene, resulting in false-negative results. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (D.R. Congo), little is known about the prevalence of the pfhrp2 gene deletion among P. falciparum isolates infecting symptomatic patients, especially in low to moderate transmission areas where pfhrp2 deletion parasites are assumed to emerge and spread. Here we determine the local prevalence and factors associated with pfhrp2 gene deletions among symptomatic malaria patients in the Kwilu Province of the D.R. Congo.MethodsWe used secondary data from a prospective health facility-based cross-sectional study conducted in 2018. Blood was collected for microscopy, PfHRP2-RDT, and spotted onto Whatman filter paper for downstream genetic analysis. Genomic DNA was extracted and used to perform PCR assays for the detection and confirmation of pfhrp2 gene deletions. Fischer’s exact and the Kruskal–Wallis tests were applied to look for associations between potential explanatory variables and the pfhrp2 gene deletion with a level of statistical significance set at P < 0.05.ResultsOf the 684 enrolled symptomatic patients, 391 (57.7%) were female. The majority (87.7%) reported the presence of mosquito breeding sites within the household’s compound, and fever was the most reported symptom (81.6%). The overall prevalence of the pfhrp2 gene deletion was 9.2% (95% CI: 6.7%–12.1%). The deletion of the pfhrp2 gene was associated with health zone of origin (P = 0.012) and age (P = 0.019). Among false-negative PfHRP2-RDT results, only 9.9% were due to pfhrp2 gene deletion.ConclusionsP. falciparum isolates with pfhrp2 gene deletions are relatively common among symptomatic patients in Kwilu province. Further investigations are needed to provide enough evidence for policy change. Meanwhile, the use of RDTs targeting PfHRP2 and parasite lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) antigens could limit the spread of deleted isolates.Graphic

Highlights

  • Malaria rapid diagnostic tests have become a primary and critical tool for malaria diagnosis in malariaendemic countries where Plasmodium falciparum Histidine Rich Protein 2-based rapid diagnostic tests (PfHRP2-based Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT)) are widely used

  • Munyeku et al Infect Dis Poverty (2021) 10:77 use of RDTs targeting PfHRP2 and parasite lactate dehydrogenase antigens could limit the spread of deleted isolates

  • We found a local prevalence of 9.2% of P. falciparum isolates with a pfhrp2 gene deletion among symptomatic patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Malaria rapid diagnostic tests have become a primary and critical tool for malaria diagnosis in malariaendemic countries where Plasmodium falciparum Histidine Rich Protein 2-based rapid diagnostic tests (PfHRP2-based RDTs) are widely used. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (D.R. Congo), little is known about the prevalence of the pfhrp gene deletion among P. falciparum isolates infecting symptomatic patients, especially in low to moderate transmission areas where pfhrp deletion parasites are assumed to emerge and spread. Fifteen countries in sub-Saharan Africa and India carried nearly 80% of the global malaria burden of which Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (D.R. Congo) accounted for about 35% [1]. D.R. Congo accounts for 12% of all malaria cases in sub-Saharan Africa [1]. The high burden of malaria in D.R. Congo can be explained by the fact that nearly the entire population (97%) lives in high-transmission zones where the most common vector encountered is Anopheles gambiae, and Plasmodium falciparum is the most common species responsible for the majority of severe cases [2, 3]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call