Abstract
This study assessed the feasibility of diagnosing painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) using a postal self-completed Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) questionnaire, and it compared the prevalence of PDN in patients with diabetes attending primary and secondary care. This was an observational study in northwest England, United Kingdom (n=204). S-LANSS were used by post to diagnose PDN. Consent for participation and access of blood results were obtained from the subjects with diabetes. Ethical approval was granted to do the work. In this study the prevalence of PDN was 30.3%, comprising 33.1% of patients with type 2 diabetes compared to 14.1% patients with type 1 diabetes. The overall prevalence of PDN was 33% (n=43) in the secondary care group and 25.6% (n=19) in the primary care group; the rates were not statistically significant. There were no gender differences between the primary and secondary care populations. There was a significant association of obesity, smoking and height in males with PDN compared to the non-PDN group (p<0.05). There was a significant trend toward increasing prevalence of PDN with duration of diabetes, increasing glycated hemoglobin and increasing body mass index (p<0.05). The overall prevalence of PDN in this study was 30.3%. The results demonstrated the use of self-administered S-LANSS was easy and can be used for epidemiologic surveys of PDN. The results are comparable to and similar to other published series, in both primary and secondary care settings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.