Abstract

Preschool age is characterized by a rapid development in all aspects of child development. During this development, the introduction of emotional and behavioral disorders can happen to any child. Preschool children have been a neglected population in the study of psychopathology. The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA), which includes the Child Behavior Checklist/1.5 - 5 (CBCL/1.5 - 5), constitutes the few available measures to assess preschoolers with an empirically derived taxonomy of preschool psychopathology. The study was based on an age- and gender-stratified sample of 755 children aged 1.5 - 5 years from five municipalities of Kosovo. The CBCL/1.5 - 5 form was voluntarily completed by the parents of 426 or 56.4% boys and 329 or 43.6% girls. There were 639 or 84% mothers and 116 or 15.4 % fathers. The prevalence of total problems was estimated as 2.9%, the prevalence of externalizing behavior problems was 2.5%, while the prevalence of internalizing behavior problems was 3.8%. These results are low compared to other international studies. The results revealed that there are not significant differences in mean scores among boys and girls on total problems, internalizing and externalizing. Regarding the age, there are statistical differences within the decreasing of age among the three broad-bands syndromes. Such findings highlight the way in which preschool behavior problems may vary within specific cultural settings and underscore the need for in-depth research to explore the contexts.

Highlights

  • Social-emotional development captures a broad swath of specific outcomes, ranging from the ability to identify and understand one’s own and others’ feelings, establish and sustain relationships with both peers and adults, and regulate one’s behavior, emotions, and thoughts (National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, 2005)

  • Behaviour problems have often been conceptualized along two broad spectrums: internalizing problems which are expressed in intrapersonal manifestation, such as anxiety, depression and withdrawal; and externalising problems which are demonstrated in interpersonal manifestation, such as hyperactivity and aggression (Achenbach, 1991; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2000; Dearing et al, 2006)

  • Some studies have shown that girls are much more likely to cope with stress using internalizing behaviors while boys are more likely to use externalizing behaviors (Hoffman & Su 1997; Moffitt et al, 2001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social-emotional development captures a broad swath of specific outcomes, ranging from the ability to identify and understand one’s own and others’ feelings, establish and sustain relationships with both peers and adults, and regulate one’s behavior, emotions, and thoughts (National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, 2005). Behaviour problems have often been conceptualized along two broad spectrums: internalizing problems which are expressed in intrapersonal manifestation, such as anxiety, depression and withdrawal; and externalising problems which are demonstrated in interpersonal manifestation, such as hyperactivity and aggression (Achenbach, 1991; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2000; Dearing et al, 2006). The literature suggests that boys and girls often manifest different health, mental health, social, and behavior problems (Baillargeon et al, 2007; Maschi et al, 2008). Some studies have shown that girls are much more likely to cope with stress using internalizing behaviors (e.g., anxiety and depression) while boys are more likely to use externalizing behaviors (e.g., anger or aggression) (Hoffman & Su 1997; Moffitt et al, 2001). Achenbach and Rescorla (2000) found a positive correlation between internalizing and externalizing scores among a national US sample, suggesting that children tend to score in both areas of problems Other research has reported a significant correlation between internalizing and externalizing problems (e.g. Achenbach & Rescorla, 2000; Mesman, Bongers, & Koot, 2001). Achenbach and Rescorla (2000) found a positive correlation between internalizing and externalizing scores among a national US sample, suggesting that children tend to score in both areas of problems

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.