Prevalence, electroclinical spectrum and effect on the outcome of non-convulsive status epilepticus in critically ill patients; the utility of routine electroencephalogram

Abstract

ObjectivesTo highlight the importance of routine electroencephalogram (rEEG) in detecting non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), describing the electroclinical spectrum and effect on outcome in critically ill patients with altered mental status (CIPAMS). MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted at King Fahd University Hospital. Clinical data and EEG recordings of CIPAMS to rule out NCSE were reviewed. All patients had at least 30 minutes of EEG recording. The Salzburg Consensus criteria (SCC) were applied to diagnose NCSE. The data analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0. The chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables such as etiologies, EEG findings, and functional outcomes. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify the predictors of unfavorable outcomes. ResultsA total of 323 CIPAMS referred to rule out NCSE were enrolled (mean age 57.8 ± 20 years). Nonconvulsive status epilepticus was diagnosed in 54 (16.7%) patients. A significant association was found between subtle clinical features and NCSE (P =< 0.01). Acute ischemic stroke (18.5%), sepsis (18.5%), and hypoxic brain injury (22.2%) were the main etiologies. The previous history of epilepsy was significantly associated with NCSE (P = 0.01). Acute stroke, cardiac arrest, mechanical ventilation, and NCSE were statistically associated with unfavorable outcomes. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus was an independent predictor of unfavorable outcomes (P = 0.02, OR = 2.75, CI = 1.16–6.48) during multivariable analysis. Sepsis was associated with higher mortality (P =< 0.01, OR = 2.4, CI = 1.4–4.0). SignificanceOur study findings suggest that the utility of rEEG in detecting NCSE in CIPAMS should not be underestimated. Important observations further indicate that repeating rEEG is advisable, as this would increase the likelihood of identifying NCSE. Thus, physicians should consider and repeat rEEG when evaluating CIPAMS in order to detect NCSE, which is an independent predictor of unfavorable outcomes. Nonetheless, further studies comparing rEEG and cEEG yields are required to augment the current understanding of the electroclinical spectrum and better describe NCSE in CIPAMS.