Abstract

BackgroundManagement of co-infections including cryptococcal meningitis, tuberculosis and other opportunistic infections in persons living with HIV can lead to complex polypharmacotherapy and increased susceptibility to drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Here we characterize the frequency and types of potential DDIs (pDDIs) in hospitalized HIV patients presenting with suspected cryptococcal or tuberculous meningitis.MethodsIn a retrospective review of three cryptococcal meningitis trials between 2010 and 2017 in Kampala, Uganda, medications received over hospitalization were documented and pDDI events were assessed. IBM Micromedex DRUGDEX® online drug reference system was used to identify and describe potential interactions as either contraindicated, major, moderate or minor. For antiretroviral DDIs, the Liverpool Drug Interactions Checker from the University of Liverpool was also used to further describe interactions observed.ResultsIn 1074 patients with suspected meningitis, pDDIs were present in 959 (overall prevalence = 89.3%) during the analyzed 30 day window. In total, 278 unique interacting drug pairs were identified resulting in 4582 pDDI events. Of all patients included in this study there was a mean frequency of 4.27 pDDIs per patient. Of the 4582 pDDI events, 11.3% contraindicated, 66.4% major, 17.4% moderate and 5% minor pDDIs were observed. Among all pDDIs identified, the most prevalent drugs implicated were fluconazole (58.4%), co-trimoxazole (25.7%), efavirenz (15.6%) and rifampin (10.2%). Twenty-one percent of the contraindicated pDDIs and 27% of the major ones involved an antiretroviral drug. Increased likelihood of QT interval prolongation was the most frequent potential clinical outcome. Dissonance in drug interaction checkers was noted requiring clinicians to consult more than one database in making clinical decisions about drug combinations.ConclusionsThe overall prevalence of pDDIs in this population is high. An understanding of drug combinations likely to result in undesired clinical outcomes, such as QT interval prolongation, is paramount. This is especially important in resource limited settings where availability of therapeutic drug monitoring and laboratory follow-up are inconsistent. Adequate quantification of the increased likelihood of adverse clinical outcomes from multiple drug-drug interactions of the same kind in a single patient is needed to aid clinical decisions in this setting.

Highlights

  • Management of co-infections including cryptococcal meningitis, tuberculosis and other opportunistic infections in persons living with Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can lead to complex polypharmacotherapy and increased susceptibility to drug-drug interactions (DDIs)

  • An understanding of drug combinations likely to result in undesired clinical outcomes, such as QT interval prolongation, is paramount

  • 278 unique interacting drug combinations were identified resulting in 4582 potential DDIs (pDDIs) events. (Supplemental Table 1) For all patients included in this study, there was a mean frequency of 4.27 pDDIs per patient with an overall range of 0–23 pDDIs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Management of co-infections including cryptococcal meningitis, tuberculosis and other opportunistic infections in persons living with HIV can lead to complex polypharmacotherapy and increased susceptibility to drug-drug interactions (DDIs). We characterize the frequency and types of potential DDIs (pDDIs) in hospitalized HIV patients presenting with suspected cryptococcal or tuberculous meningitis. The complexity of the treatment regimen for HIV patients presenting with suspected meningitis further increases their risk of polypharmacy. Some potentially interacting drug pairs are still likely to be prescribed in combination with relatively high frequency due to limitations on alternative medication therapy for specified treatment regimens [5, 6]. Epidemiological data suggest that the absolute number of patients who do experience some kind of drug interaction-based adverse event is high, especially in the presence of known risk factors like older age or polypharmacy [9]. Recognition of pDDIs is valuable as it creates knowledge that aids clinicians to prevent aDDIs

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call