Abstract

Hepatitis C virus infection is a constant worldwide public health concern. The prevalence of HCV infection is higher in patients on chronic haemodialysis (HD) than in the general population. Despite the control of blood products, hepatitis C virus transmission is still being observed among patients undergoing dialysis. Detection systems for serum HCV antibodies are insensitive in the acute phase because of the long serological window. Direct detection of HCV depends on PCR test but this test is not suitable for routine screening. The objective of this study was to determine prevalence of HCV, genotyping and if HCV core antigen test could be a better alternative to NAT techniques for the diagnosis of HCV infection during the window period and whether the sensitivity for antibody detection is preserved. We screened 159 patients on long-term dialysis by HVC antibodies test, PCR HCV-RNA and HCV core antigen test by commercial tests. The prevalence of HCV was 10.7% (17 patients) and genotype 4 was the most common one (64.7%). The sensitivity of HCV core antigen test was 94.1%, the specificity 100%, the positive predictive power 100%, and the negative predictive power 97.9%. In conclusions; patients on maintenance HD in Yemen have a high prevalence of HCV infection comparing with general population; and genotype 4 is predominant. The performance of serological detection of HCV core antigen was better than that of HCV antibodies test and may be an alternative to nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) for routine monitoring of patients on chronic dialysis.

Highlights

  • Performance of HCV antibodies test and HCV Core there was an increasing trend of HCV infection with protein test compared to HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA)

  • Current result is similar to that reported in a large population-based cohort studies by Ohsawa et al.,[27]; and by Kato et al.,[28] in which no subjects, who were negative for HCV core antigen, were positive for HCV-RNA; Ohsawa et al.,[27] and Kato et al.,[28] suggests that detection of HCV core antigen combined with anti-HCV antibody is useful in predicting long-term survival prognosis of persistent HCV infection in HD patients

  • Serological detection of HCV core antigen may be an alternative to nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) techniques for routine monitoring of patients on chronic dialysis towards the prevention of HCV spread

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

An estimated 143 million people (2%) worldwide are infected with hepatitis C as reported in 20151. Gender and age group's which are possible associated risk core antigen test in patients on chronic HD in the early diagnosis of HCV infection[12,13,14]. The objective of this factors for HCV infection were assessed. For HCV, study was to determine prevalence of HCV, genotyping persons with evidence of previous or current infection and if HCV core antigen test could be better an with HCV were matched up with those who were HCV alternative to NAT techniques for the diagnosis of negative. OR-Odds ratio ≥ 1 is at risk of infection, CI-Confidence intervals; χ2-Chi-square ≥ 3.83 is significant p-Probability value ≤ 0.05 is significant

RESULTS
Findings
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call