Abstract

BackgroundFew hospitals and heart failure (HF) clinics offer concurrent palliative care (PC) together with life-prolonging therapies. To know the prevalence of patients in HF clinics needing PC and useful tools to recognize them are the first steps to extending PC in those settings. However, it is still unknown whether tools commonly used to identify patients with HF needing PC can correctly distinguish them. Two systematic reviews found that the NECesidades PALiativas (NECPAL) tool was one of the two most commonly used tools to asses PC needs in HF patients. Therefore, we assessed 1) the prevalence of PC needs in HF clinics according to the NECPAL tool, and 2) the characteristics of the patients identified as having PC; mainly, their quality of life (QoL), symptom burden, and psychosocial problems.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted at two HF clinics in Colombia. We assessed the prevalence of PC in the overall sample and in subgroups according to clinical and demographic variables. We assessed QoL, symptom burden, and psychosocial problems using the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). We compared the results of these tools between patients identified as having PC needs (+NECPAL) and patients identified as not having PC needs (–NECPAL).ResultsAmong the 178 patients, 78 (44%) had PC needs. The prevalence of PC needs was twice as nigh in patients NYHA III/IV as in patients NYHA I/II and almost twice as high in patients older than 70 years as in patients younger than 70 years. Compared to –NECPAL patients, +NECPAL patients had worse QoL, more severe shortness of breath, tiredness, drowsiness, and pain, and more psychosocial problems.ConclusionThe prevalence of PC needs in outpatient HF clinics is high and is even higher in older patients and in patients at more advanced NYHA stages. Compared to patients identified as not having PC needs, patients identified as having PC needs have worse QoL, more severe symptoms, and greater psychosocial problems. Including a PC provider in the multidisciplinary team of HF clinics may help to assess and cover these needs.

Highlights

  • Few hospitals and heart failure (HF) clinics offer concurrent palliative care (PC) together with life-pro‐ longing therapies

  • Aim In this study, we assessed 1) the prevalence of PC needs in outpatient HF clinics according to the NECesidades PALiativas (NECPAL) tool, and 2) the characteristics of the patients identified as having PC needs; mainly, their health-related quality of life (QoL), symptom burden, and psychosocial problems, assessed using the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF12) [15], the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) [16], and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) [17]

  • Despite the NECPAL tool is based on life expectancy and disease severity, we found that patients in need of PC were those with more symptoms, more psychosocial problems, and lower disease-related QoL

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Few hospitals and heart failure (HF) clinics offer concurrent palliative care (PC) together with life-pro‐ longing therapies. Two systematic reviews found that the NECesidades PALiativas (NECPAL) tool was one of the two most commonly used tools to asses PC needs in HF patients. We assessed 1) the prevalence of PC needs in HF clinics according to the NECPAL tool, and 2) the characteristics of the patients identified as having PC; mainly, their quality of life (QoL), symptom burden, and psychosocial problems. Through the heart failure (HF) trajectory, patients have a wide range of physical and psychological symptoms that affects their quality of life (QoL) [1]. The NECesidades PALiativas (NECPAL) tool was created to identify in clinical practice patients with chronic disease and a limited life expectancy who might benefit from PC [8]. Two recent systematic reviews found that, among the studies assessing PC needs in patients with HF, the NECPAL tool was one of the two most commonly used screening tools [12, 13]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call