Abstract

Our medical team of 12 people conducted a series of mobile health clinics sponsored by an indigenous relief organization in rural Ethiopia. Coordinating with local health authorities, the purpose of these clinics was to provide acute care medical treatment and public health teaching. Initially, we used a 'pre-triage' process that had evolved over a series of previous rural mobile clinic trips. This process involved the lead physician and a nurse-translator moving through the crowd selecting prospective patients based on appearance and responses to simple questions. A significant problem arose when a large crowd of people, desperate to be seen, disrupted the process and jeopardized the safety of our team. We subsequently developed a process that used an introductory session, introducing the team and describing the process of patient selection. We also modified the pre-triage process by involving more people in patient selection. In subsequent clinics, this new process was well accepted and contributed to increased efficiency and an overall improved community outreach. After experiencing an adverse situation, we developed a system for patient selection that was well accepted and efficient. We found that it was essential to set expectations regarding the purpose of the mobile clinic and the scope of problems that could be treated. This was best done at the outset of the clinic in coordination with local health authorities. In actual patient selection, or pre-triage, we found it advantageous to enlist the participation of the crowd and to send several clinicians among those wishing to be seen for medical care. This new approach to patient selection became an essential element in the success of our mobile health outreach.

Highlights

  • Context: Our medical team of 12 people conducted a series of mobile health clinics sponsored by an indigenous relief organization in rural Ethiopia

  • The authors were asked to conduct a series of mobile health clinics at the request of an indigenous development organization, Project Mercy, in rural Ethiopia[1,2]

  • The clinics were run from established rural health centers

Read more

Summary

Our response

When we returned to the Project Mercy compound, we reflected on the experience and redesigned our processes so that we could select patients in a more organized and efficient manner. We resolved to use the following approach: On arrival at the health center, as before, most of the team worked to set up the clinic. Another small group, featuring the group leader, a nurse-translator and the lead physician, would address the crowd to set expectations. O Was not a surgical team and could not treat cataracts, scarring from trachoma and chronic orthopedic problems. The three or four nurses were able to go to different parts of the crowd and could take more time to talk to the patients and their neighbors. The logistics person directed people to correct locations, answered questions and solved problems as they occurred

Result of new approach
Lessons learned
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call