Abstract

Pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis play a critical role in the economic production of sugars and fuels from lignocellulosic biomass. In this study, we evaluated diverse pilot-scale pretreatments and different post-pretreatment strategies for the production of fermentable sugars from sugarcane bagasse. For the pretreatment of bagasse at pilot-scale level, steam explosion without catalyst and combination of sulfuric and oxalic acids at low and high loadings were used. Subsequently, to enhance the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis of the pretreated bagasse, three different post-pretreatment process schemes were investigated. In the first scheme (Scheme 1), enzymatic hydrolysis was conducted on the whole pretreated slurry, without treatments such as washing or solid–liquid separation. In the second scheme (Scheme 2), the pretreated slurry was first pressure filtered to yield a solid and liquid phase. Following filtration, the separated liquid phase was remixed with the solid wet cake to generate slurry, which was then subsequently used for enzymatic hydrolysis. In the third scheme (Scheme 3), the pretreated slurry was washed with more water and filtered to obtain a solid and liquid phase, in which only the former was subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis. A 10 % higher enzymatic conversion was obtained in Scheme 2 than Scheme 1, while Scheme 3 resulted in only a 5–7 % increase due to additional washing unit operation and solid–liquid separation. Dynamic light scattering experiments conducted on post-pretreated bagasse indicate decrease of particle size due to solid–liquid separation involving pressure filtration provided increased the yield of C6 sugars. It is anticipated that different process modification methods used in this study before the enzymatic hydrolysis step can make the overall cellulosic ethanol process effective and possibly cost effective.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13205-016-0446-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • In recent times, various pilot and demonstration scale operations have been carried out for the biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic (LC) biomass to fuel ethanol and other essential commodity biochemicals (Klein-Marcuschamer and Blanch 2015; Agrawal et al 2015; Larsen et al 2012)

  • Dynamic light scattering experiments conducted on post-pretreated bagasse indicate decrease of particle size due to solid–liquid separation involving pressure filtration provided increased the yield of C6 sugars

  • The second part focuses on the yield of glucose and xylose for the three enzymatic hydrolysis process schemes explored in this study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Various pilot and demonstration scale operations have been carried out for the biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic (LC) biomass to fuel ethanol and other essential commodity biochemicals (Klein-Marcuschamer and Blanch 2015; Agrawal et al 2015; Larsen et al 2012). Use of dilute acid (DA), hot-water and steam explosion (SE) for the pretreatment of LC biomass is considered relatively cost effective (Geng et al 2015) These treatments highly solubilize xylose in monomeric or oligomeric form or a mixture of both in the aqueous phase (Geng et al 2015; Guo et al 2012; Hernandez et al 2012). Solid fraction is further washed extensively with water to remove the inhibitors, and hydrolyzed and fermented separately or together with the prehydrolyzate (Ioelovich and Morag 2012; Xue 2011) All these processes require additional process water in the overall scheme of bioethanol production, leading to lower ethanol concentration and more energy input for distillation (Larsen et al 2012; Macrelli et al 2012). New process methods that enhance the yield of fermentable sugars by enzymatic hydrolysis are highly desirable as higher sugar concentration results in higher ethanol concentration (4–5 w/w %) leading to lower energy requirements for ethanol distillation (Macrelli et al 2012; Zacchi and Axelsson 1989)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.