Abstract

Simple SummaryIn the context of a growing variety in treatment strategies for patients with cancer, especially approaches based on antiangiogenetic pathways, we aimed to identify a useful biomarker for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Our experimental results detected vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in patients’ pre-therapeutic plasma, and not serum, which serves as a suitable biomarker for outcome prognostication. Results were validated in an independent cohort, confirming VEGF as an independent predictor (Pi) of outcomes in HNSCC patients. Therefore, pre-therapeutic VEGF in plasma may be an attractive biomarker in future HNSCC studies.Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is centrally involved in cancer angiogenesis. We hypothesized that pre-therapeutic VEGF levels in serum and plasma differ in their potential as biomarkers for outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. As prospectively defined in the study protocols of TRANSCAN-DietINT and NICEI-CIH, we measured VEGF in pretreatment serum and plasma of 75 HNSCC test cohort (TC) patients. We analyzed the prognostic value of VEGF concentrations in serum (VEGFSerum) and plasma (VEGFPlasma) for event-free survival (EFS) utilizing receiver-operating characteristics (ROC). Mean VEGF concentrations in plasma (34.6, 95% CI 26.0–43.3 ng/L) were significantly lower (p = 3.35 × 10−18) than in serum (214.8, 95% CI 179.6–250.0 ng/L) but, based on ROC (area under the curve, AUCPlasma = 0.707, 95% CI 0.573–0.840; p = 0.006 versus AUCSerum = 0.665, 95% CI 0.528–0.801; p = 0.030), superiorly correlated with event-free survival (EFS) of TC patients. Youden indices revealed optimum binary classification with VEGFPlasma 26 ng/L and VEGFSerum 264 ng/L. Kaplan–Meier plots demonstrated superiority of VEGFPlasma in discriminating patients regarding outcome. Patients with VEGFPlasma < 26 ng/L had superior nodal (NC), local (LC) and loco-regional control (LRC) leading to significant prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and EFS. We successfully validated VEGFPlasma according the cut-off <26 ng/L as predictive for superior outcome in an independent validation cohort (iVC) of 104 HNSCC patients from the studies DeLOS-II and LIFE and found better outcomes including prolonged tumor-specific (TSS) and overall survival (OS). Outcomes in TC and iVC combined again was related to VEGFPlasma, and multivariate Cox regression revealed that VEGFPlasma was an independent outcome predictor. In HNSCC, pre-therapeutic VEGFPlasma is prognostic for outcomes.

Highlights

  • Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and its main representative isoformVEGFA, is a main driver of angiogenesis, a hallmark of cancer [1,2]

  • We demonstrate the superiority of circulating VEGF from plasma over serum of therapy-naïve head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients as a potential biomarker and further validate its potential as an independent predictor (Pi) of outcome in an independent cohort

  • According to our results, based on VEGF quantification in plasma and serum of therapy-naïve test cohort (TC) patients, VEGFPlasma is superior to VEGFSerum as a prognostic biomarker for outcomes in event-free survival (EFS) (p = 0.001), progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.006), LC (p = 0.042), nodal control (NC) (p = 0.015), and loco-regional control (LRC)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and its main representative isoformVEGFA, is a main driver of angiogenesis, a hallmark of cancer [1,2]. Because VEGF is a central player in physiological and pathophysiological vascularization and angiogenesis and is, causatively involved, and reflects oncological processes, it has already been under investigation as a potential biomarker in several cancer entities [15,16,17,18,19]. There may be various reasons for this and may include prior difficulties to demonstrate a substantial survival benefit justifying acceptance of adverse events [22]. Such difficulties may result from the limited availability of specimen collected alongside clinical trials [23] and, even more relevant, difficulties in comparing the previous literature because of inconsistent standards in VEGF measurements [24]

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call