Abstract

Previous work has shown a strong correlation between zeolite framework flexibility and the nature of structural symmetry and phase transitions. However, there is little experimental data regarding this relationship, in addition to how flexibility can be connected to the synthesis of these open-framework materials. This is of interest for the synthesis of novel zeolites, which require organic additives to permutate the resulting geometry and symmetry of the framework. Here, we have used high-pressure powder X-ray diffraction to study the three zeolites: Na-X, RHO and ZK-5, which can all be prepared using 18-crown-6 ether as an organic additive. We observe significant differences in how the occluded 18-crown-6 ether influences the framework flexibility—this being dependent on the geometry of the framework. We use these differences as an indicator to define the role of 18-crown-6 ether during zeolite crystallization. Furthermore, in conjunction with previous work, we predict that pressure-induced symmetry transitions are intrinsic to body-centred cubic zeolites. The high symmetry yields fewer degrees of freedom, meaning it is energetically favourable to lower the symmetry to facilitate further compression.

Highlights

  • Zeolites are a class of microporous aluminosilicates, recognized for possessing periodic open-framework structures

  • We propose that pressureinduced changes in symmetry are an intrinsic feature to body-centred cubic zeolites

  • Throughout the entirety of the experiment, the empty zeolite remained within the flexibility window, indicating that there were no deformations of the rigid tetrahedra

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Zeolites are a class of microporous aluminosilicates, recognized for possessing periodic open-framework structures. Conventional solid-state chemistry considers solids as static materials; zeolite frameworks demonstrate an inherent flexibility [3,4,5,6,7]. The TO4 tetrahedral units are rigid, the T-O-T bridging angles possess significant freedom, permitting the framework to contract or expand as a response to thermodynamic stimuli [1,8]. Such low-frequency dynamics can result in distortions of the underlying SBUs and in some cases alterations in symmetry

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.