Pressure drop of three-phase liquid–liquid–gas slug flow in round microchannels

Abstract

In this paper we present a model for the calculation of pressure drop of three-phase liquid–liquid–gas slug flow in microcapillaries of a circular cross section. Introduced models consist of terms attributing for frictional and interfacial pressure drop, incorporating the presence of a stagnant thin film at the wall of the channel. Different formulations of the interfacial pressure drop equation were employed, using expressions developed by Bretherton (J Fluid Mech 10:166–188, 1961), Warnier et al. (Microfluid Nanofluid 8:33–45, 2010) or Ratulowski and Chang (Phys Fluids A 1:1642–1655, 1989). Models were validated experimentally using oleic acid–water–nitrogen and heptane–water–nitrogen three-phase flows in round Teflon or Radel R microchannels of 254- and 508-µm nominal inner diameter, for capillary numbers Cab between 10−4 and 4.9 × 10−1 and Reynolds numbers Re between 0.095 and 300. Best agreement between measured and calculated values of pressure drop, with relative error between −22 and 19 % or −20 and 16 %, is reached for Warnier’s or Ratulowski and Chang’s interfacial pressure drop equation, respectively. The results prove that three-phase slug flow pressure drop can be successfully predicted by extending existing two-phase slug flow correlations. Good agreement of Bretherton’s equation was reached only at lower Ca numbers, indicating that an extension of the interfacial pressure drop equation as performed by Warnier et al. (Microfluid Nanofluid 8:33–45, 2010) or Ratulowski and Chang (Phys Fluids A 1:1642–1655, 1989) for higher capillary numbers is necessary. Additionally it was demonstrated that pressure drop increases substantially if dry slug flow occurs or if microchannels with significant surface roughness are employed. Those influences were not accounted for in the models presented.