Abstract
This paper examines youth homelessness, precarity and poverty via a critical account of ‘Generation Rent’ – that young people are living in the private rental sector (PRS) in perpetuity having been locked out of both homeownership and social renting. The paper examines precarity in relation to employment (non-standard contracts) and housing (insecurity and evictions) with reference to in-depth interviews undertaken with 55 young people aged 18-30. This multi-ethnic group of low-income youth were living in temporary accommodation either in East London or in South East England having been displaced there from London. The paper illustrates the interlinkages between employment and housing precarity. The young people experienced the ‘low-pay, no-pay cycle’ which contributed towards making the expensive London PRS an insecure and unrealistic housing ‘option’. Their preferred housing was social renting, but access to this diminished due to austerity-related welfare cutbacks. Despite the young people’s well-founded antipathy towards the PRS, they were increasingly being steered towards this tenure destination by housing officials – a case of coerced, ‘press-ganged’ Generation Rent.
Highlights
For most of the post-War period, the UK private rental sector (PRS) was regarded as a ‘transitional tenure’ which primarily catered for young people before they moved into either owner occupation or social housing, i.e. the two ‘tenures of destination’ (Ineichen, 1981; Kemp and Keoghan, 2001)
This paper critically examines the notion of Generation Rent by focussing on low-income, homeless youth in London in relation to employment and housing precarity
The young people themselves had a remarkably realistic assessment of their incapacity to sustain a PRS tenancy given the kind of precarious National Minimum Wage (NMW) jobs they had had in the past and were likely to have in the future (Mayock and Parker, 2019)
Summary
This paper examines youth homelessness, precarity and poverty via a critical account of ‘Generation Rent’ – that young people are living in the private rental sector (PRS) in perpetuity having been locked out of both homeownership and social renting. The paper examines precarity in relation to employment (non-standard contracts) and housing (insecurity and evictions) with referenceto in-depth interviews undertaken with young people aged 18-30. This multi-ethnic group of low-incomeyouth wereliving in temporary accommodation either in East London or in South East England having been displaced there from London. The young people experienced the ‘low-pay, no-pay cycle’ which contributed towards making the expensive London PRS an insecure and unrealistic housing ‘option’ Their preferred housing was social renting, but access to this diminished due to austerity-related welfare cutbacks. This paper critically examines the notion of Generation Rent by focussing on low-income, homeless youth in London in relation to employment and housing precarity
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
