Abstract
It has long been recognized that Presidents seek to influence Supreme Court policy by the appointment of ideologically "correct" Justices. Implicit here is the assumption that the Court response (if any) will be in the direction of the new appointee. The specific task of this paper is to challenge that assumption by showing what results, in group policy, can be expected from various kinds of changes in group membership. Before turning to this demonstration, however, some background must be set out. Toward this end, a model of Supreme Court decision making will be constructed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
