Abstract

This article reports the results of an investigation into the political opportunities and constraints which confront a President when deciding who will serve in his cabinet. The primary focus is on the reasons offered for presidential selections of individuals to serve. This has been accomplished with a newly collected set of data on the initial appointments of first-term Presidents, from Washington to Reagan. Representation theory has proven useful as a general framework for analysis. In addition, realignment theory helps to explain historical variation in the impact of representational criteria. Results reflect the importance of representation in cabinet selection, with Presidents striving to foster the impression that the cabinet is a well-rounded, balanced and representative institution. Over the period studied, shifting electoral cleavages have had significant impact on the criteria of recruitment to the cabinet.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.