Abstract
The president's programs are not monopoly and excluding, rather competitive and open to the members of congress; not commanding and abiding by, rather persuading and being persuaded; not comprehensively dominating the whole process of the Congress, rather only leading the legislative process of the Congress. The president 's programs exit in the State of the Union Address mostly. The reasons include the Constitution of the United States, the president itself and the congress itself ext.. The president's programs are based on separation, checks & balance, are different from rights-reflecting legislative plans of England and China's autonomous legislative plans. China's autonomous legislative plans include three categories mandatory plans that must be completed when conditions are ripe, guiding plans that are ready to be completed as far as possible and researching plans that continue to be studied and considered according to circumstances. The president should struggle for his (or her) legislative programs to pass and is constraint of objective, subjective and externally environmental factors. Whether the president can successfully start the legislative programs of the Congress and whether each legislative project can pass through the legislative process of the Congress can be judged objectively by the president's public opinion support rate and party support rate, and subjectively by the president's subjective efforts, negotiation ability and persuasion ability, as well as the external environment when the president competes with the Congress, such as war or peace, economic situation, etc.
Highlights
The legislative planning power of the United States president is directly reflected by the president's legislative programs
Through the form of "speech report" and "report speech" in the State of the Union address, and interpret Obama's legislative plan in 2012 according to the thinking of "trichotomy", the results show that the first category of projects mainly include: (1) innovation act; (2) job creation act; (3) opportunity provision bill for homeowners; (4) Insider Trading prohibition bill for members of Congress; and (5) simple rules bill of the Senate
Rather than saying that the president "owns" the legislative planning power of the Congress with 100% of the president’s planning power, it is more accurate to say that the president "dominates" the legislative programs of the Congress, "greatly affects" the legislative planning process of the Congress, and even "practically controls" the legislative planning power of the Congress
Summary
The legislative planning power of the United States president is directly reflected by the president's legislative programs. It refers to the legislative project proposed by the president; dynamically, the game between the president and the Congress develops, and the time flows to form a legislative plan. When it is converted to the two angles of power and right, the president 's programs is put on the table. The president's programs is a non-monopolistic and non-imperative "particular power". The non-monopoly originated from competition with Parliament members, the group of people with actual ownership (performance on average). The non-command is a customary practice based on historical tradition, which is more tacit rather than fixed.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
