Abstract
The traditional understanding of intellectual property (IP) suggests that each IP category has a discrete subject matter of its own and exceptions thereto. Based on such an understanding of IP law, one would assume that there would not be overlapping IP protection for the same subject matter or product features. However, this understanding does not hold water. It has been argued that the development of overlapping IP rights has intensified as the subject matter that can be protected has expanded through the introduction of new rights and as the scope of protection for existing rights has increased. What may be particularly problematic is that, when policymakers focus on one IP regime at time, any issues arising from IP overlaps may remain undetected. For quite some time, there has been a policy tendency towards broadening the scope of intellectual property protection, which has led to a decrease in scope for the public domain. This tendency shows that the value of the public domain has not been appropriately identified or at the least not appreciated. One way to define the public domain is as the sphere that is not protected by any form of IP. This article will focus on the overlaps created by the Software Copyright and Trade Secrets Directives with regard to the protection of software. The ultimate aim of the article is to query whether the combined effects of these two Directives could be interpreted in a way that limits the undesirable expansion of protection.
Highlights
The traditional understanding of intellectual property (IP) suggests that each IP category has a discrete subject matter of its own and exceptions thereto
What may be problematic is that, when policymakers focus on one IP regime at time, any issues arising from IP overlaps may remain undetected
Place to protect the sphere of the public domain are not appropriately enabling access to information in the context of software. This is a particular problem under the software copyright rules, which seem to lead to a lack of accessibility to ideas in software products, even though the founding principle of the copyright regime is that ideas should be free
Summary
The traditional understanding of intellectual property (IP) suggests that each IP category has a discrete subject matter of its own and exceptions thereto. Place to protect the sphere of the public domain are not appropriately enabling access to information in the context of software This is a particular problem under the software copyright rules, which seem to lead to a lack of accessibility to ideas in software products, even though the founding principle of the copyright regime is that ideas should be free. Putative holders of trade secrets should not receive trade secret protection based on the copyright regime’s inappropriate restrictions on accessing information This is one way of addressing the problem related to IP overlaps and adhering to a balanced approach to the scope of IP protection and protection of the public domain. The article has limited itself to these two protection categories in a specific context, it is assumed that its findings may have a more generic relevance for the overlap discourse
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
