Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the clinical presentation of patients with extradural spinal tumours and establish the factors that determined the treatment they received and outline the outcomes of that treatment at the University Teaching Hospital between January 2013 and December 2016.
 Material and Methods: This was a retrospective study of the presentation, management and short- term outcome of extradural spinal tumours at the University Teaching Hospital. A questionnaire was used to obtain data from patients' hospital records. Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel and the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 25 software.
 Results: Of the 62 patients in the study,34 were female and 28 male. The age range was 14 to 87 years, with a mean of 55.03. Backache (93.8%), Limb weakness (91.9%), loss of sensation (50%), urine and stool incontinence (43.5% and 41.9% respectively), back deformity (11.3%), night pain (85.5%), weight loss(67.7%), poor appetite (61.3%), fever (35.5%) and night sweats(29%) were common symptoms. Sixty-eight percent of patients were bedridden. Visual Analogue Scale scores were greater than 5 in 84% of patients. A muscle power grade of 3 or less (n=48), impaired muscle tone (n=38), abnormal reflexes (n=52), presence of a sensory level(n=37) and back deformity (n=17) were common signs. Plain radiography, Computed Tomography Scans, Magnetic Resonance Scans and Tecnetium Bone scans were done in 60, 35, 17 and 2 patients respectively. The commonest surgical host category was A (64%). Secondary Extradural Spinal Tumours comprised 82% while 18% were primary. Surgery was done in 14 patients with 1 failing to afford implants. Forty-eight received nonsurgical treatment. Nineteen percent of patients had improved pain scores but the rest remained the same or worsened after treatment. Complications included decubitus ulcers, Urinary Tract Infection, Deep Veinous Thrombosis, pneumonia, sepsis and joint stiffness. Fourty patients died and eighteen patients were lost to follow-up.
 Conclusions: The ages of patients followed normal distribution with female to male ratio of 1.2 to 1. Most patients presented with symptoms and signs of advanced disease. The type of extradural spinal tumour, stage of disease, completeness of diagnostic workup, availability of implants, need for tissue diagnosis, type of surgical host and availability of nonsurgical treatment modality determined the choice of treatment. Poor outcomes in quantity and quality of life are a reflection of the late presentation, delayed diagnosis, lack of resources and difficulty of treating these tumours. Extradural spinal tumours are not uncommon and cause significant morbidity and mortality in those affected.

Highlights

  • This chapter has focused on reviewing literature relevant to the study to identify what others have done in developing and developed countries

  • To determine the symptomatology and examination findings in patients presenting to the University Teaching Hospital with extradural spinal tumours

  • We used convenient sampling of all patients with spinal tumours who presented during the study period to identify those with extradural spinal tumours who were included in the study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This chapter has focused on reviewing literature relevant to the study to identify what others have done in developing and developed countries. Spinal tumours or neoplasms are abnormal new growths arising from any of these tissues They may be secondary deposits (metastases) to these tissues from tumours elsewhere in the body. Depending on their location in relation to the dura mater, spinal tumours are classified anatomically as: Extradural: when they are located outside the dura mater. The majority of extradural spinal tumours involve the vertebrae (Heller, 1997) Intradural: when they are located within the confines of the dura mater. The standard deviation of 17.046 years meant that each of the participants was expected to be 17.046 years below or above the mean age of 55.03 years. The research findings have further revealed that 1 (1.6%), 47 (75.8%), 6 (9.7%), and 8 (12.9%) patients were divorced, married, single and widowed respectively

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call