Abstract

Rod outer segments (ROS) are responsible for the visual transduction process. Rhodopsin, which constitutes 85-90% of ROS proteins, absorbs light photons, changes its conformation, and then binds to a heterotrimeric G-protein called transducin. As a consequence, transducin dissociates into Talpha and Tbetagamma subunits. The presence in ROS of a phospholipase A2 (PLA2) stimulated by light and guanosine 5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate was first demonstrated in 1987 (Jelsema, C. L.(1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 163-168). This led that author to conclude that ROS PLA2 could be involved in the phototransduction process, and raised the possibility of receptor-mediated activation of PLA2 via G-proteins in cell types other than rods. However, the biochemical characteristics and the role of this PLA2 have not been fully elucidated. We have tried to reproduce some of the results previously reported in order to further characterize this enzyme. We have found that, in our hands, there is neither light-dependent nor GTP-dependent PLA2 activity in intact purified ROS. We also failed to detect PLA1 activity in those ROS preparations. Nevertheless, we detected significant amounts of PLA2 activity in two subretinal fractions adjacent to ROS: RPE (enriched with retinal pigment epithelial cells) and P200 (presumably containing neuronal cells, Müller cells, and rod inner segments). The enzyme present both in RPE and P200 is light- and GTP-independent, Ca2+- and Mg2+-independent, and seems to be optimally active in the alkaline pH range. Our results suggest that there is, if any, vanishingly little PLA2 or PLA1 activity in intact purified ROS and that the activity levels previously reported in the literature could have been due to a contamination by either RPE or P200. This is supported by our observation that some contaminated ROS preparations were "PLA2 active."

Highlights

  • Jelsema reported in 1987 [5] that phospholipase A2 (PLA2) activity was present in “crude Rod outer segments (ROS)” and “partially purified ROS,” and that this activity was stimulated by light and a non-hydrolyzable analog of GTP, GTP␥S

  • The maximum activity that they observed was approximately 1 order of magnitude lower than that reported by Jelsema [5]

  • Castagnet and Giusto [9] published data on ROS PLA2 activity but the maximum activity that they obtained was almost 3 orders of magnitude lower than that reported by Jelsema [5]

Read more

Summary

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials—1-Palmitoyl-2-[14C]arachidonoyl-phosphatidylcholine ([14C] PAPC), 1-hexadecyl-2-[14C]arachidonoyl-phosphatidylcholine ([14C]HAPC), 1-palmitoyl-2-[14C]arachidonoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine ([14C]PAPE), 1-[14C]oleoyl-2-[14C]oleoyl-phosphatidylcholine ([14C]DOPC), and Econofluor-2 were from Dupont Canada. 1-Oleoyllysophospholipids and dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC) were from Avanti Polar Lipids. Purified v-ROS were assayed for purity and intactness as described below They were either used directly for PLA2 activity measurement, processed for electron microscopy, or aliquoted and stored at Ϫ80 °C. Purified h-ROS were resuspended in a minimal volume of buffer B and assayed for purity and intactness (see below) Purified diluted ROS (SN 140,000 ϫ g) were collected at the 27–32% interface, mixed with 1 volume of buffer C and centrifuged (17,500 ϫ g, 4 °C, 5 min; Sorvall SS34 rotor). Hs-ROS were assayed for purity and intactness as described below ROS intactness was estimated by measuring the production of NADPH as described by Schnetkamp and Daemen [36]

RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Experimental conditions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call