Abstract

IntroductionParkinson's disease (PD) treatment should follow guidelines and be tailored to each patient. Large database analyses can provide insights into prescribing patterns.MethodsRetrospective, cross-sectional study of patients (≥30 years) with PD diagnosis (ICD-10; schizophrenia/cerebrovascular disease excluded) using health insurance claims data (April 2008–December 2016) from the Japan Medical Data Vision database. Prescription patterns of anti-PD drugs were analysed by patient age and sex, calendar year, and overall.ResultsThe analysis comprised 155,493 PD patient-years (56.1% women, mean 73.4 years). Patient number increased each year, mainly because of database expansion. L-dopa as monotherapy was the most common prescription (22.7% of patient-years); non-ergot dopamine agonists (DAs) were also common (7.6% as monotherapy, 6.8% with L-dopa). Monotherapy was prescribed for ~50% of patient-years, two drugs for 14.1%, and at least three drugs for 18.4%. Consistent with Japanese guidelines, L-dopa was mostly prescribed to older patients (≥60 years), whereas non-ergot DAs were mostly prescribed to middle-aged patients (peak at 50–69 years). Between 2008 and 2011, L-dopa prescription decreased while that of non-ergot DAs increased; this pattern reversed between 2012 and 2016.ConclusionThese results indicate that Japanese clinicians are adhering to Japanese guidelines and tailoring anti-PD treatment to individual patients.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.