Abstract

Twenty patients have undergone presacral neurectomy at Yale-New Haven hospital over the past 7 years. The patients were separated into three subdivisions according to abnormal findings at the time of surgery: group I, endometriosis; group II, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID); and group III, those patients with neither endometriosis nor pelvic inflammatory disease but with pelvic pain and infertility. At the time of surgery, an attempt was made to correct and repair coexistent pelvic abnormalities. The groups were evaluated for relief of pain and subsequent viable intrauterine pregnancy. A control group of infertility patients complaining of pain who underwent infertility laparotomy without presacral neurectomy was used for comparison. Presacral neurectomy has traditionally been performed for pain associated with endometriosis and has resulted in subsequent pain relief and pregnancy rates of 30% to 60%. Pregnancy rates of 46% to 47% were found in the PID group, the endometriosis group, and the control group. In addition, 75% of the patients with either PID or endometriosis had significant relief of pain following presacral neurectomy as compared with only 26% of the control group undergoing only infertility laparotomy. It is concluded from these findings that presacral neurectomy plus reconstructive pelvic surgery is more effective than infertility laparotomy alone for the treatment of pelvic pain but that presacral neurectomy does not increase the subsequent incidence of pregnancy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call