Abstract

Digital scholarship and electronic publishing within scholarly communities change when metrics and open infrastructures take center stage for measuring research impact. In scholarly communication, the growth of preprint repositories as a new model of scholarly publishing over the last three decades has been one of the major developments. As it unfolds, the landscape of scholarly communication is transitioning—with much being privatized as it is made open—and turning towards alternative metrics, such as social media attention, author-level, and article-level metrics. Moreover, the granularity of evaluating research impact through new metrics and social media changes the objective standards of evaluating research performance. Using preprint repositories as a case study, this article situates them in a scholarly web, examining their salient features, benefits, and futures. Moves towards scholarly web development and publishing on the semantic and social web with open infrastructures, citations, and alternative metrics—how preprints advance building the web as data—is discussed. We determine that this will viably demonstrate new metrics and, by enhancing research publishing tools in the scholarly commons, facilitate various communities of practice. However, for preprint repositories to be sustainable, scholarly communities and funding agencies should support continued investment in open knowledge, alternative metrics development, and open infrastructures in scholarly publishing.

Highlights

  • Electronic publishing has provided many benefits for sharing research materials online

  • Preprint repositories are gaining momentum in becoming active partners of the scholarly research ecosystem and they contribute to open scholarship as a new model of scholarly publishing, as discussed in this article

  • The dangers of the commercialization of preprints does not augur well for open science. This necessitates questions regarding the sustainability of preprint repositories and to what degree commercial business models interfere with open science

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Electronic publishing has provided many benefits for sharing research materials online. Outputs of publications in a variety of ways have increased, preprints stand out for their “accessibility” to early disseminated versions and “subject to review” status They are publicly accessible and typically in line with definitions of open access, before being formally published. In scientific writing, various roles of authorship, levels of contribution, and the rules for publishing research data in the public domain, especially before the paper released was defined by journals. It was the editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, Franz J. With clear guidelines for authorship, academics and researchers primarily began communicating scientific research through peer reviewed journals for publishing their scholarship

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call