Abstract

CPED presents guiding principles, rather than a prescriptive program model, for the EdD, requiring each CPED-influenced institution to engage in a program design process specific to its context. Over 80 CPED schools and colleges of education offer an EdD program that endorses the CPED framework which “blend[s] practical wisdom with professional skills and knowledge to name, frame, and solve problems of practice…”(CPED, 2010). As with any design process in a complex organization, faculty members may wonder where to begin. This article describes the context, guiding values, characteristics of our redesigned EdD, lessons learned, and implementation challenges of the education administration faculty in the Graduate School of Education at Portland State University as we increased our focus on CPED principle #1, a focus on “equity, ethics, and social justice to bring about solutions to complex problems of practice” (CPED, 2009).

Highlights

  • CPED-inspired institutions of higher education endeavor to prepare scholarly practitioners who frame their focus on “questions of equity, ethics, and social justice to bring about solutions to complex problems of practice” (CPED, 2009)

  • This means that scholarly practitioners in CPED-inspired EdD programs are prepared to lead complex organizations in which students of all backgrounds have equitable access to and success in rigorous, rich, culturally responsive educational opportunities

  • Because CPED presents guiding principles, rather than a prescriptive program model, each CPEDinfluenced institution engages in a program design process specific to their context

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

CPED-inspired institutions of higher education endeavor to prepare scholarly practitioners who frame their focus on “questions of equity, ethics, and social justice to bring about solutions to complex problems of practice” (CPED, 2009). This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-­‐Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press. I conclude the article with lessons learned during the redesign process and implementation challenges

THE CONTEXT FOR REDESIGNING OUR EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION EDD
GUIDING VALUES
OUR REDESIGNED MODEL
Doctoral Curricular Changes
Guiding Questions to Align with CPED Principles
STAKEHOLDER CONSENSUS
Analysis of Benefits and Limitations of our Model
LESSONS LEARNED FROM OUR REDESIGN PROCESS
IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call