Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the importance for faculty to become familiar with the general guidelines for collecting, assembling and preparing a tenure and promotion (T&P) application or dossier at a Primarily Undergraduate Institution (PUI) and the critical role that mentoring plays throughout the T&P process. While key elements of the application process such as submission timelines and documentation guidelines are usually outlined in the faculty handbook of the specific institution, many aspects of assembling the dossier are not necessarily detailed in writing anywhere. Instead, there are important elements of the T&P process that typically rely on institutional knowledge and guidance that is often communicated informally. Junior faculty who have limited access to “informal communications” are at a significant disadvantage when they go through the T&P process even when they show accomplishments in teaching effectiveness, research, and service. The problem is especially important for women and underrepresented minority faculty in STEM disciplines that are less well represented among senior faculty in STEM. Senior faculty often serve as informal or formal mentors to their less seasoned colleagues. The goal of this article is to help demystify the T&P process by offering practical suggestions and describing some of the specific materials and steps that are an important part of documenting the development of a faculty member at a PUI.

Highlights

  • This paper will focus on key aspects of the tenure and promotion (T&P) process at Primarily Undergraduate Institutions (PUI) designated by the Carnegie Classifications system [1], including liberal arts colleges

  • PUI’s generally have higher teaching loads, advising loads, and service expectations combined with fewer financial resources available to fund undergraduate research programs than Doctoral Universities – Very high research activity (R1)/Doctoral Universities – High research activity (R2) institutions [3, 4]

  • While we cannot offer specific remedies for these inequities, we aim to offer practical tips for navigating the T&P application process

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper will focus on key aspects of the T&P process at Primarily Undergraduate Institutions (PUI) designated by the Carnegie Classifications system [1], including liberal arts colleges. An article by Boyce and Aguilera in this issue of BMC proceedings describes the process of applying for tenure at research-intensive R1/R2 institutions [2]. A tenure at a PUI requires excellence in teaching, mentoring and a significant research component that engages undergraduates in meaningful ways leading to scholarly works and documented student success. PUI’s generally have higher teaching loads, advising loads, and service expectations combined with fewer financial resources available to fund undergraduate research programs than R1/R2 institutions [3, 4]. These hurdles present a unique challenge for faculty during the T&P process. The article by Dahlberg, King-Smith and Riggs in this issue gives important help on how to setup and build a productive research lab at a PUI [5]

Objectives
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call