Abstract

Depending on the substituents, the reaction of the activated alkynes ZC≡CZ (2a‐g) [Z = CO2R: R = Me (a), Et (b); Z = R1: R1 = CF3 (c), CH2Cl (d), CH2Br (e); Z = CH2OC(O)R2: R2 = Me (f), CCl3 (g)] with the labile ruthenium complex (η2‐C2H4)Ru(CO)4 (1) results in the formation of three different types of heterocycles. While the reactions of the dialkyl acet‐ylenedicarboxylates 2a, b lead to the dimeric tricarbonylru‐thenacyclopentadienes 3a, b, being catalytically active in the cyclotrimerization of alkynes like 2a, b, the application of the 1,4‐halogeno‐2‐butynes 2c‐e yields the bicyclic heterocycles 4c‐e. The esters of 2‐butyne‐1,4‐diol 2f, g are converted into the tetracarbonylruthenacyclopentadienes 5f, g. Investigation of the primary attack of the alkynes 2a‐g at complex 1 leads to the conclusion, that an ionic mechanism is preferred in the ruthenium‐catalyzed cyclotrimerization of electron‐poor alkynes. If, instead of 1, (η2‐C2H4)Os(CO)4 (6) is allowed to react with the acetylenes 2a, b the osmium complexes (η4‐C6Z6)Os(CO)3 (7a, b) are isolated. In the presence of CO at 2 bar 7a, b release the benzene derivatives C6Z6 (8a, b) with the formation of Os3(CO)12.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.