Abstract

In order to quantify organic impurities in gas produced from renewable sources, thermal desorption coupled with GC-MS or GC×GC-MS is very useful. However, the preparation of the standard tubes appears not to be trivial. For that, different strategies, based on commercial setups, have been developed. The goal of this study was to compare the classical manual deposit of a liquid standard solution with other commercial methods such as gas stream assisted deposit and vaporization followed by adsorption assisted by gas stream. A standard mixture of 48 compounds from different families was used for the comparison of the performances of the three strategies using the accuracy profile methodology. A global validation score was attributed to each strategy as well as a score according to family of compounds and boiling point range, in order to provide a detailed comparison of the techniques. On the set of studied molecules, commercial setups were found to be more efficient than the manual deposit.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.