Preparation of muscle samples for comparative electron microscopy.

Abstract

The interpretation of muscle structure by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has not been consistent among various studies. Consequently, the literature is confusing with respect to the identity of T-tubules, transverse ridges, Z-disks, and intermyofibrillar connections. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effects of different methods of sample preparation and imaging on ultrastructural details of previously identified transverse structures and intermyofibrillar connections and to verify or disprove the commonality of these structures under different viewing conditions. Scanning electron microscopy coupled with a cold stage, SEM at room temperature, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of thin sections were most appropriate for exposing detail of inter- and intracellular structures and for measuring sarcomere length and spacing of intermyofibrillar connections. Scanning electron microscopy of samples mounted on a cold stage, fractured, and sublimed provided excellent images of meat and muscle ultrastructure and may be used in correlative microscopy. Sarcomere length and spacing between intermyofibrillar connections were similar among most specimen preparation techniques and were affected similarly by heat treatments. Results indicate that the regularly spaced transverse structures viewed by conventional SEM and the intermyofibrillar connections viewed by low-temperature SEM are Z-disks.