Abstract
Preparation of RuOx from RuO4, as well as from in situ generated ‘ruthenium hydroxide’ or ruthenate ions, followed by calcinations at 400 °C, reproducibly affords active catalysts generally without noxious oxidation of the CdS support, whereas impregnation of RuCl3·3H2O and subsequent annealing yield poor materials; in the latter procedure the Cds is irretrievably damaged.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
More From: Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
