Abstract

Prefabricated building development increasingly requires foam concrete (FC) insulation panels with low dry density (ρd), low thermal conductivity coefficient (kc), and a certain compressive strength (fcu). Here, the foam properties of a composite foaming agent with different dilution ratios were studied first, high-belite sulphoaluminate cement (HBSC)-based FCs (HBFCs) with 16 groups of orthogonal mix proportions were subsequently fabricated by a pre-foaming method, and physical properties (ρd, fcu, and kc) of the cured HBFC were characterized in tandem with microstructures. The optimum mix ratios for ρd, fcu, and kc properties were obtained by the range analysis and variance analysis, and the final optimization verification and economic cost of HBFC was also carried out. Orthogonal results show that foam produced by the foaming agent at a dilution ratio of 1:30 can meet the requirements of foam properties for HBFC, with the 1 h bleeding volume, 1 h settling distance, foamability, and foam density being 65.1 ± 3.5 mL, 8.0 ± 0.4 mm, 27.9 ± 0.9 times, and 45.0 ± 1.4 kg/m3, respectively. The increase of fly ash (FA) and foam dosage can effectively reduce the kc of the cured HBFC, but also leads to the decrease of fcu due to the increase in mean pore size and the connected pore amount, and the decline of pore uniformity and pore wall strength. When the dosage of FA, water, foam, and the naphthalene-based superplasticizer of the binder is 20 wt%, 0.50, 16.5 wt%, and 0.6 wt%, the cured HBFC with ρd of 293.5 ± 4.9 kg/m3, fcu of 0.58 ± 0.02 MPa and kc of 0.09234 ± 0.00142 W/m·k is achieved. In addition, the cost of HBFC is only 39.5 $/m3, which is 5.2 $ lower than that of ordinary Portland cement (OPC)-based FC. If the surface of the optimized HBFC is further treated with water repellent, it will completely meet the requirements for a prefabricated ultra-light insulation panel.

Highlights

  • Since ‘sustainability’ was widely adopted as a key criterion for the assessment of construction materials and buildings [1,2,3], researchers around the world have realized the growing demandMaterials 2019, 12, 984; doi:10.3390/ma12060984 www.mdpi.com/journal/materialsMaterials 2019, 12, 984 for lightweight, economical, easy-to-use, and environmentally sustainable building materials in the future [4,5,6,7,8]

  • Khan et al found that polypropylene fiber (PP) could increase the flexural strength (f b ) and tensile strength (f t ) of Foam concrete (FC), but it had no effect on compressive strength (f cu ), while basalt fiber could greatly increase f cu, f b, and f t of FC, which was better than

  • In order to seek the optimum mixture ratio of HBSC-based FC (HBFC) meeting the performance requirements of modern prefabricated lightweight panels, mix proportions of 16 groups HBFCs were designed with an orthogonal experiment, and the HBFCs were fabricated by the pre-foaming method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since ‘sustainability’ was widely adopted as a key criterion for the assessment of construction materials and buildings [1,2,3], researchers around the world have realized the growing demand. Foam concrete (FC) products with low self-weight, high specific strength, and excellent thermal insulation performance become very attractive in the application of prefabricated building panels [7,9]. Nowadays HBSC is widely used, allowing that HBSC-based FC (HBFC) has better thermal insulation performance than ordinary concrete and can be used for insulation panels to realize the energy-saving efficiency of buildings [20]. The fresh FC prepared by the pre-foaming method has good fluidity and can be pumped to a long distance, which meets the prefabricated process, while the mix-foaming method is generally not used for pumping and just for on-site pouring. In order to seek the optimum mixture ratio of HBFCs meeting the performance requirements of modern prefabricated lightweight panels, mix proportions of 16 groups HBFCs were designed with an orthogonal experiment, and the HBFCs were fabricated by the pre-foaming method. The corresponding ρd , f cu , and kc were characterized and analyzed by ANOM and ANOVA, the optimization verification of the mix ratio and economic cost of HBFC were evaluated

Raw Materials
Mix Proportion and Orthogonal Experimental Design
Preparation Procedures of HBFC
Property
Properties of Foam
Dry Density
Compressive Strength
Thermal Conductivity
Macroscopic and Microscopic Observation
Foam Properties
Physical Properties and Orthogonal Range Analysis
Effect
Effect of Various Factors on Compressive Strength
Analysis of Variances Comprehensive Evaluation on the Optimal Ratio
Cost and Scalability of HBFC
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call