Abstract

Dynamic layer-by-layer (LBL) self-assembly technology was used to prepare as few as three to five bilayers of poly(diallyl-dimethylammonium chloride) (PDADMAC) and poly(styrene sulfonate) (PSS) on negatively charged polysulfone (PS) ultrafiltration (UF) membranes of 50kDa MWCO and compared with those of the static assembly membranes. The prepared dynamic assembly (PDADMAC/PSS)4 nanofiltration (NF) membrane showed a permeation flux of 60Lm−2h−1 at 1.0MPa, much higher than that of the commercial DL membrane (GE Osmonics, USA), but with a rejection of about 90% of SO42− which is relatively less than that of the DL membrane. The rejection performance showed that the dynamic–static assembly was more effective than others. Using dynamic–static assembly preparation, the rejection of (PDADMAC/PSS)3 membrane was about 90%, while the flux was about 55Lm−2h−1 at 1.0MPa. The surface morphology of the prepared LBL membranes were characterized by SEM and AFM, and no defect was found. The surface morphology of the membrane prepared by dynamic–static assembly was almost the same as the commercial membranes. The analysis of filtration resistance indicated that the deposition of the first and second bilayer was crucial during the whole preparation process.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call