Preoperative Sizing to Lower In-Stent Restenosis in Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

Abstract

ObjectivesThe primary treatment for lower extremity peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) is angioplasty-stenting. Its main complication is in-stent restenosis. Poor selection of stent dimensions has been identified as a factor contributing to early in-stent restenosis. The aim of this study is to determine whether the implantation of stents, selected based on arterial morphological reconstruction using sizing software, reduces the occurrence of in-stent restenosis. The study also aims to evaluate the potential benefits of routine preoperative sizing. MethodsBetween January 2016 and December 2020, all patients treated for PAOD through scheduled angioplasty-stenting in our department were included in the study. Using systematic preoperative Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA), precise reconstruction and sizing were performed to select the ideal length and diameter of stents, resulting in the selection of a so-called IDEAL stent. During the procedure, the surgeon implanted either the IDEAL stent or a different one, named the ACTUAL stent, based on intraoperative data and/or availability. We compared the in-stent restenosis rate between IDEAL and ACTUAL stents. ResultsThere were no significant differences in the overall characteristics between the IDEAL and ACTUAL stent groups. The in-stent restenosis rate at one year was 13% (N=28/212, P=0.994) in the IDEAL group and 17% (N=25/149, P=0.994) in the ACTUAL group. Among the ACTUAL stents, a total of 19.6% of stents with a diameter mismatch when chosen based on arteriography showed a significantly higher restenosis rate during the first year of follow-up (P=0.02). ConclusionsOur study did not demonstrate a significant difference in 1-year restenosis rate between the IDEAL and the ACTUAL stents groups. It specifically revealed the significant impact of diameter selection on the intrastent restenosis rate during the first year of follow-up. Stents chosen based on arteriographic criteria, which exhibited diameter discordance, compared to the IDEAL stents group selected using sizing reconstructions, could be either oversized or undersized. This led to a significantly higher restenosis rate at 1 year postoperative.