Abstract

BackgroundThis systematic review examines which patient related factors influence functional and clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsWe performed a systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched databases and trial registries for prospective studies including OA patients who underwent primary THA. Studies with preoperative measurements on predictors, with at least 1 year follow-up were included. Risk of bias and confounding was assessed for two domains: follow-up rate and looking at independent effects.ResultsThirty-five studies were included (138,039 patients). Only nine studies (29 %) had low risk of bias for all domains thus suggesting an overall low quality of evidence. Studies were heterogeneous in the predictors tested and in the observed directions of the associations. Overall, preoperative function (13 studies (37 %), 2 with low risk of bias) and radiological OA (6 studies (17 %), 1 with low risk of bias) were predictors with the most consistent findings. Worse preoperative function and more severe radiological OA were associated with larger postoperative improvement. However, these patients never reached the level of postoperative functioning as patients with better preoperative function or less severe radiological OA. For age, gender, comorbidity, pain and quality of life the results of studies were conflicting. For BMI, some studies (n = 5, 2 with low risk of bias) found worse outcomes for patients with higher BMI. However, substantial improvement was still achieved regardless of their BMI.ConclusionThere is not enough evidence to draw succinct conclusions on preoperative predictors for postoperative outcome in THA, as results of studies are conflicting and the methodological quality is low. Results suggest to focus on preoperative function and radiological osteoarthritis to decide when THA will be most effective. The present mapping of current evidence on the relationship between patient related factors and outcomes provides better information compared to individual studies and may help to set patient expectations before surgery. In addition, these findings may contribute to discussions on how to achieve the best possible postoperative outcome for specific patient groups.Trial registrationThis systematic review was registered in Prospero, registration number RD42014009977.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1070-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • This systematic review examines which patient related factors influence functional and clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA)

  • Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is an effective treatment for most individuals who suffer from pain and loss of function due to end stage symptomatic hip osteoarthritis (OA)

  • Complication rates after surgery were higher for patients with a higher body mass index (BMI), but the patient reported outcomes did not show clinically relevant differences depending on BMI in both low and high risk of bias studies. This may be explained partly because we focused on long term follow-up (≥1 year) and did not investigate short term complications, which more often occur in patients with a higher BMI

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This systematic review examines which patient related factors influence functional and clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA). Defined criteria to assess when patients will benefit most from surgery are clearly warranted, as it may sometimes be better to first optimize the patient’s preoperative condition. The development of defined criteria to assess which patients will benefit most from surgery would preferably be based on the best available evidence. Other patient related factors, such as preoperative function, pain and quality of life, were not included. Providing such an overview may contribute to discussions on how to achieve the best possible postoperative outcome for specific patient groups

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call