Preoperative lung surface localization for pulmonary wedge resection: a single-center experience.

Abstract

BackgroundPreoperative lung surface localization is effective in sublobar resection for small lung nodules. However, the efficacy may vary depending on the underlying conditions of the lung and tumor, as well as the technique. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and limitations of preoperative lung surface localization for wedge resection by analyzing the outcomes of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous marking and virtual-assisted lung mapping (VAL-MAP).MethodsWe investigated 215 patients who underwent curative wedge resection for malignant tumors using CT-guided localization or VAL-MAP from 1998 to 2018 in our institute. Each resected nodule was assessed for successful resection, which was defined as complete resection with adequate margins.ResultsOne-hundred-and-nineteen patients with 153 nodules were included. The overall successful resection rate was 87.6%. The successful resection rate was significantly lower for nodules with intraoperative adhesion than those without intraoperative adhesion (75.0% vs. 90.1%; P=0.034), and for tumors requiring deep resection margins (>31 mm) than those requiring shallow margins (≤31 mm) (76.7% vs. 94.6%; P=0.002). Although the successful resection rate for nodules resected using CT-guided localization was significantly lower in cases with versus without intraoperative adhesion (54.5% vs. 86.7%; P=0.048), the successful resection rate for nodules resected using VAL-MAP was not influenced by the presence or absence of adhesion (85.7% vs. 93.4%; P=0.491).ConclusionsA requirement for deeper resection and the presence of intraoperative adhesion were limitations of preoperative lung surface localization for curative pulmonary wedge resection.