Abstract

Recent advances in endovascular treatment have improved the safety and efficacy of this procedure, and the number of cases in which preoperative embolization is performed is likely to increase. Preoperative tumor embolization is still a controversial treatment, and as long as it carries a risk of complications, its primary benefit of reducing blood loss during surgery may not be sufficient to justify treatment. We recently reported that preoperative embolization does not significantly increase complications, but may prolong recurrence-free survival. However, currently, tumor embolization is only a preoperative adjunctive therapy, and there is no evidence that it is a stand-alone option for meningioma treatment. Nevertheless, the possibility that tumor embolization alone can promote tumor shrinkage and reduce peripheral oedema has been reported, although the number of cases is small. Further research is needed, but in the future, tumor embolization may become an in-office treatment under certain conditions, such as in cases of poor general condition, multiple meningiomas, recurrent and refractory cases, difficult surgery and cases where re-irradiation is difficult after post-radiation therapy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.